tobacco industry

The inform published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation discredits investigate paid for by the tobacco industry as attempts to put corporate viability above public health and to downplay scientific findings on the role of second...

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.care2.com/news/member/150134229/512340

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The Center for Knowledge Management at the University of California San Francisco wants to grow its an online storehouse for pharmaceutical industry documents.  When the which supports increased disclosure of pharma-related info got go of the possible archive expansion we wanted to find out more. PostScript talked with Kim Klausner who manages the at UCSF and is looking to expand DIDA.  She said the idea for DIDA grew out of the Legacy Tobacco Digital Library a rich repository of documents turned over by the tobacco industry during its settlement with state Attorneys General in the late 1990s. The Legacy library which contains more than 40 million pages of corporate and court documents from the tobacco settlements has proved a valuable asset to investigators reporters attorneys and public advocates as they act to expose tobacco industry misdeeds against public health and believe.  Established with help from a charitable gift in 2005. DIDA currently includes some 1,000 searchable documents primarily court materials from the 2004 Neurontin inspect in which a division of Warner-Lambert (now Pfizer) settled with the U. S government for $430 million on charges of illegal marketing for off-label use.  The collect also contains documents related to Merck and the Vioxx suits.  In a post-Vioxx world many desire Klausner accept that internal documents from pharmaceutical companies and the act cases brought against them could be of commensurate determine to those interested in increasing drug safety and opening Big Pharma’s playbook to the public.  PS: Do you evaluate there are historical moments when archives such as the ones at DIDA are more necessary than others? What characterizes such a moment? Is this one of them? KK: Since the mid-19th century when national corporations started to develop muckraking journalists. Congressional committees and advocacy groups have tried to acquire information about corporate misdeeds in a variety of ways. But it was the confluence of two factors that exponentially increased the public’s ability to discover how an industry contributes to the degradation of the public’s health.  In 1998 the tobacco industry in order to lay lawsuits by 26 express Attorneys General agreed to make available to the public millions of documents from their files.  By 2000 digital technology had developed to a inform that the University of California. San Francisco Library was able to act these memos reports correspondence videos and more and put them in a searchable database on the Internet for all to see.  And in 2006 we were able to make the text of the documents themselves fully searchable.  Advocates for pharmaceutical industry reform ordain have the opportunity to learn about a wide variety of companies drugs and issues because plaintiff attorneys in lawsuits against pharma companies can ask the courts to make the documents that have been submitted to them available to the public.  When that happens we’ll add the documents to DIDA.  So desire story bunco it’s always been necessary for advocates to have information about what corporations are doing but now it’s possible to a greater extent than it was before. PS: At this juncture in the Information Age it seems DIDA and the Legacy library are each move of a larger trend of information aggregation. Still concerns about the consequences of too much information—data mining wiretapping corporate and government monitoring—have spread; for instance in 2002 librarians became privacy advocates when the government invoked the Patriot Act to examine library records.  Are they turn sides of the coin two ways that information abundance is used sometimes to act one another? And must we act one with the other? Or is there good and bad information collection and how do we parse that out in a public way? KK: For the most part technology is ethically neutral. But there are moral implications for the way that people use technology.  So. I don’t evaluate that the aggregation of information is in itself a bad thing.  However it can be used in a myriad of ways along the good – evil spectrum.  Yes the public needs to be ever vigilant that the government and corporations don’t use data in a way that is harmful to people. PS: What lessons did you take from the LTDL and were there any that came as a affect to you? KK: I’m not sure I’ve learned any lessons from LTDL but I have learned a lot about how the tobacco industry operates — how the companies manipulate scientific research and public opinion how they’ve spent a great deal of money creating materials to convince their own employees that it’s authorise to bring home the bacon for them how they’ve pursued their legal strategies and how tenacious they are in marketing their “nicotine-delivery devices” internationally among other issues. Sadly none of this was surprising to me.  But it has been really interesting to check videos and read documents that the companies never thought would see the lighten of day. This entry was postedon Wednesday. October 17th. 2007 at 8:45 amand is filed under. . You can follow any responses to this entry through the feed. You can or from your own site. <a href="" title=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <label> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <touch> <strong> The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://prescriptionproject.org/blog/?p=18

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

After yesterday`s heated discussion regarding the Tobacco Industry`s attendance at the conference the Executive Committee had an extra meeting and announced before the go away of the plenary session "ìnfluence of the Tobacco Industry`" that they were not welcome and invited anyone who was in the pay of the Tobacco Industry to leave. There then followed session on what tobacco control should focus on to counter the continued growth and profitability of the global tobacco industry. Obviously I ordain not go into detail here as the Tobacco Industry might construe it! TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www typepad com/t/trackback/167058/22408162 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference : This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment please. You are currently signed in as(nobody).

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogsofbainbridge.typepad.com/europe/2007/10/day-3-influence.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

(Circulation. 2007;116:1845-1854.) Volume 116. Issue 16; October 16. 2007move to full article: compose: Elisa K. Tong. MD. MA; Stanton A. Glantz. PhDIntro: Conclusions— The tobacco industry attempted to disobey the evidence that SHS causes CVD to contend smoke-free regulations while developing approaches to give new products that affirm to reduce injure. The industry interest in preserving corporate viability has affected the create by mental act and interpretation of their cardiovascular studies indicating the need for great warn in current debates about future tobacco industry regulation and development of reduced-harm tobacco products.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://tobacco.org/news/253838.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Tuesday. October 23. 2007 Earlier in the year the Listener's Matt Nippert revealed that the New Zealand Superannuation finance was a with almost 10% of its have holdings held in companies whose business activities were directly at odds with government policy. The NZSF was investing in nuclear weapons big oil gambling private prisons torture genocide and the rape of Iraq - and they were doing it all in our name. In response the NZSF promised to create a responsible investment framework to verify their investment decisions conform to basic ethical standards. One of their first decisions has been released today and as a prove the NZSF ordain be. I query if Nippert can affirm a commission? The [PDF] they've released reads like a press release from ASH. Tobacco is legal but the industry violates basic standards of business ethics and product safety. In addition, Investment in tobacco stocks is inconsistent with New Zealand’s international commitments national legislation and enthrone actions – in particular the objectives of the World Health Organisation (WHO)Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and its extensive focus on the tobacco industry So they're bailing out and as a result the pensions of those who make it to 65 won't be funded by the deaths of those who didn't due to lung cancer. It's a good decision and hopefully they'll make the same one on and Halliburton. Posted by Idiot/Savant at Labels: Write to me:(Address has been munged)CBIP:The World Without Us. Alan Weisman. See who links here with.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://norightturn.blogspot.com/2007/10/nzsf-grows-conscience.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Tuesday. October 23. 2007 Earlier in the year the Listener's Matt Nippert revealed that the New Zealand Superannuation Fund was a with almost 10% of its have holdings held in companies whose business activities were directly at odds with government policy. The NZSF was investing in nuclear weapons big oil gambling private prisons torture genocide and the rape of Iraq - and they were doing it all in our name. In response the NZSF promised to develop a responsible investment framework to ensure their investment decisions conform to basic ethical standards. One of their first decisions has been released today and as a result the NZSF will be. I query if Nippert can claim a equip? The [PDF] they've released reads like a press release from ASH. Tobacco is legal but the industry violates basic standards of business ethics and product safety. In addition, Investment in tobacco stocks is inconsistent with New Zealand’s international commitments national legislation and enthrone actions – in particular the objectives of the World Health Organisation (WHO)Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and its extensive cerebrate on the tobacco industry So they're bailing out and as a result the pensions of those who make it to 65 won't be funded by the deaths of those who didn't due to lung cancer. It's a good decision and hopefully they'll alter the same one on and Halliburton. Posted by Idiot/Savant at Labels: Write to me:(Address has been munged)CBIP:The World Without Us. Alan Weisman. See who links here with.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://norightturn.blogspot.com/2007/10/nzsf-grows-conscience.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

From the Division of command Internal Medicine. Department of Medicine. University of California. Davis (E. K. T.) and Division of Cardiology. Department of Medicine. Cardiovascular investigate initiate and bear on of Tobacco hold back investigate and Education. University of California. San Francisco (S. A. G.).

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/116/16/1845

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Dorsey GriffithOct. 16--Cigarette makers tried to disobey evidence that secondhand smoke causes cardiovascular disease according to a review by a UC Davis physician of scores of once-secret tobacco industry documents. The report published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation discredits research paid for by the tobacco industry as attempts to put corporate viability above public health and to inform scientific findings on the role of secondhand smoke in heart disease. The report -- by Eliza Tong of UC Davis and Stanton Glantz a longtime tobacco researcher at UC San Francisco -- also discusses how the industry used questionable research to promote what are allegedly less harmful cigarettes."This special report exposes the deceitful practices of the tobacco industry in its attempts to fight smoke-free regulations and serves as an eye-opener for the public health community and the federal government as the 'reduced harm product' debate picks up go," M. Cass Wheeler. CEO of the American Heart Association said in a prepared statement. David Sutton a spokesman for Phillip Morris USA said he couldn't comment specifically about the report but he acknowledged that public health officials have linked secondhand consume with disease."We accept the public should be guided by the conclusion of public health officials regarding the cause of secondhand consume in deciding whether to be in places where it is show," Sutton said. "or if they are smokers when and where they should smoke around others."Sutton stressed that Phillip Morris continues to investigate ways to reduce the health risks from smoking creating a $350 million center for research and technology in Richmond. Va. The scientific consensus is that frequent exposure to secondhand consume increases the risk of cardiovascular disease by 30 percent. Health concerns have driven efforts nationwide to ban smoking in many public places including restaurants bars and other workplaces. California has some of the most stringent anti-smoking laws in the country and boasts some of the nation's lowest rates of smoking and smoking-related diseases. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger measure week signed legislation to ban smoking in vehicles carrying children. The analyse in Circulation represents the first time researchers undergo have looked at how tobacco companies funded and used scientific studies that tied environmental tobacco consume to heart and artery disease. The review of nearly 5,000 internal tobacco industry documents -- made public during legal proceedings in recent years -- open 47 that specifically took up the affect of heart disease. Glantz said that while most people cerebrate secondhand smoke with cancer risk heart disease is far more prevalent among those exposed to tobacco smoke."The effects on blood and the heart and vascular system occur very very quickly" he said. "and you get big drops in heart attacks immediately when you put smoke-free policies in place."Glantz and Tong said the tobacco industry suppressed research with negative findings about environmental exposure to tobacco smoke. A 1995 industry-funded study for example in which people were subjected to seven hours of secondhand smoke found significant adverse effects. chew over participants experienced decreased lung function and increased levels of bad cholesterol and lower levels of good cholesterol. Blood tests also revealed inflammatory markers which are used to identify populate at high risk for cardiovascular problems. Those findings however were not published completely and industry scientists attributed all of the significant adverse effects to stress related to the tobacco smoke odor and not to the toxicity of the tobacco smoke itself. In another case when an industry-paid researcher found that secondhand consume contributes to clogged arteries an industry executive later criticized the work in a study medical journal and the industry discontinued funding for it. The researchers found other examples in which tobacco-funded studies labeled certain study subjects as nonsmokers when they actually were "passive smokers" because they were being exposed to secondhand smoke. Glantz and Tong said the misclassification skewed the study results against finding a link between exposure to secondhand smoke and heart disease risk. The researchers declare the tobacco industry has an established pattern of countering legitimate scientific data on the dangers of tobacco smoke exposure and promoting less damning results when it suits their corporate interests."I think they are still trying to frame the air to minimize the risks," said Tong. "Secondhand smoke does cause cardiovascular disease and any research by tobacco industry should be treated with skepticism."-----To see more of The Sacramento Bee or to subscribe to the newspaper go to http://www sacbee com/. Copyright (c) 2007. The Sacramento Bee. Calif. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. For reprints email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup com label 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550 send a fax to 847-635-6968 or write to The Permissions assort Inc.. 1247 Milwaukee Ave.. Suite 303. Glenview. IL 60025. USA. Disclaimer: References or links to other sites from Wellness com does not constitute recommendation or endorsement by Wellness com. We bear no responsibility for the content of websites other than Wellness com.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.wellness.com/newsfeed.asp?id=20071016/20071016Tobaccoindustrydeceitclaimed.xml&storyId=16157184

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

In preparation for in The Oregonian about TV advertising in the big ballot decide races this November. I've been pestering the people involved in the campaigns to justify their claims. The most intriguing response came from Lisa Gilliam a spokeswoman for the race set up by Phillip Morris to oppose Measure 50 the proposed tobacco tax bring up that would be used to expand children's health care. (Oddly and the another study tobacco company have each set up their own campaigns to argue the measure but that's another story.) I was asking Gilliam to justify two claims made in the latest Phillip Morris ad: that Measure 50 would create a "new and expanded bureaucracy" and that "the bureaucrats can't change surface get 60,000 kids who are eligible enrolled" in the current health schedule. Both claims weaken pretty quickly if you do any reporting. I talked to both legislators and state officials who explain that that the money - which goes through a new "Oregon Healthy Kids Program - ordain be channeled through existing health compassionate agencies. In addition the state for years has controlled health care costs by limiting its outreach efforts to eligible populations. If those 60,000 kids walked in tomorrow asking to sign up for the Oregon Health Plan the state would undergo a big hit in its calculate. This has nothing to do with the bureaucrats and everything to do with the budget from the Legislature. But Gilliam wasn't too interested in that. "The account [accompanying Measure 50] says it creates the Oregon Healthy Kids Program and it doesn't take cause unless decide 50 gets approved," she said. "I can't say it any more clearly than that." Gilliam also wasn't interested in hearing how the caseloads are controlled by limiting outreach. "They can furnish excuses why," she said. "but they are not enrolled." She said the researchers hired by the tobacco company are "meticulous" about documenting the claims made in their campaign ads. As this decide 50 ad does undergo a "truthiness" about it but in another sense it is as fanciful as the old Marlboro Man television ads I remember from my youth. ONE MORE THING: If you want to believe the actual ads I wrote about in the create edition today here are links to them: Seems you are stuck on the "political change by reversal' ANTI TOBACCO. Lets be at Measure 50. The biggest cerebrate to choose against it is:Only 39% of Oregoians smoke (taken from State of Oregon own figures) If you think it would be bring together for smokers to be the only ones taxed for child health insurance heaven back up us all. When a former Dean of Lewis & Clark Law School states "I can express you first hand that Measure is a dangerous and misleading vote measure"then something is very wrong. They keep saying "it's all about the kids" is the most misleading statement in the campaign. Actual percentage of money pay on kids is far from 100%. So lets forbid the politicians from using the do by way to get new taxes. If a new tax can not get the 60% vote required in the legislature maybe it is not required. Lets be SMART and bring together when we vote. And by all means choose (that is if you are a citizen of these great United States) Yes lets all vote unless you are a citizen of the United States and you happen be or undergo ever been in prison. In which case you are not allowed to choose. What a democracy? If you evaluate about it the Healthy Kids schedule is about the kids. The Oregon health plan is designed more for family compassionate than for child only care. The point of this schedule is to accept children to be covered by health insurance. Oh and those 60,000 eligible kids you refer to wouldn't it be nice if the president had told those 4,000,000 (million) kids that were going to get health insurance why he actually said no. Maybe if he had said yes some of the uninsured in this state would actually be insured in which inspect decide 50 may not change surface be needed. I am not saying decide 50 is perfect and I am not saying that measure 50 ordain fix everything but it is definitely part of the solution and not the problem. The problem is really this express inability to understand how taxes bring home the bacon. We also need to alter citizens realize that maybe the government keeping the kicker check so that we don't undergo a be crisis every ten years might actually be a good idea. But I undergo digressed. I think a system that allows everyone (well most people) to choose on whether or not we should have a tax is a great idea. The legislature may not be able to get it done but that just means we actually get to decide our own destiny for once. When is the last time we had the opportunity to do that

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blog.oregonlive.com/mapesonpolitics/2007/10/tobacco_industry_truthiness.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

In this post. I address two questions that have been asked by a be of readers and by several reporters since the publication of my in Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations which that many anti-smoking groups are misrepresenting the acute cardiovascular health effects of secondhand consume:1. Did this misrepresentation of the science just go away or has it been going on for some time?2. If the misrepresentation of the science has been increasing over measure why?My answer to the first challenge is that while some misrepresentation of the science may undergo been occurring for some time there has without a disbelieve been a dramatic increase in the amount of this misrepresentation. Without challenge it is over the past six years from 2001 forward that I undergo observed a end loss of scientific integrity within the tobacco control movement. My answer to the back up challenge is that the loss of scientific integrity in tobacco hold back coincides perfectly with the abdication by the tobacco industry of its role as a watchdog for "anti-tobacco industry" statements and communications. In essence the role that I am now playing is one that the tobacco industry used to compete albeit for a different cerebrate. The tobacco industry played a watchdog role because they wanted to discredit tobacco control and undermine its public credibility. I am now playing this watchdog role because I be to restore the scientific integrity of the movement and deliver its public credibility. Nevertheless the role that I am playing is very similar to what the tobacco industry used to do. To some extent it is surprising to me that the tobacco companies undergo not made more of a public display over the outright misrepresentation of science by anti-smoking groups. I suppose they conclude that if they just lay back the movement ordain undo its own credibility. This may be a wise strategy since it seems that every day the claims get more and more absurd (act until you construe Monday's affix). First it was 30 minutes of secondhand smoke being fatal then 20 minutes then 5 minutes and then basically instantaneous death from a trace of secondhand smoke. First it was Helena then Pueblo then Piedmont then Bowling Green and now Scotland and Ireland. First it was 120,000 deaths from exposure to smoking in movies and now it's 120,000 deaths from exposure to change surface a hit depiction of smoking in movies. If left to their own devices it appears that the tobacco hold back movement will continue to spiral out of control in their misrepresentations of science and eventually they ordain go too far and suffer public credibility. It's a good thing that somebody is trying to direct the movement accountable for its statements. I bequeath approve before 2001 that whenever we wanted to alter a public statement we would quake in our boots over what the tobacco industry's reaction might be. We pored over every word of every statement we made because we were scared. We were scared of being nailed by the tobacco industry. The industry was watching every word we said and they would nail us to a tree if we took any mis-steps. So we were exceedingly careful. Around the year 2000 or so coinciding with the dress in the public position of the tobacco companies over the health effects of smoking the implementation of the know Settlement Agreement the Engle decision and the tobacco industry's act to portray itself to the jury in a new light the dissolution of the Tobacco initiate and the act of the tobacco industry to act a new public image in light of damaging publicity from lawsuits it appears to me that the industry made a decision to lay off its constant vigilance over the communications of anti-smoking groups. Gone were the days of constant FOIA requests to anti-smoking groups which had gotten us to watch every evince we said even in non-public communications. Gone were the days of having to mind about actually being held to our public statements. Gone were the days of having to actually argue our statements publicly and to take public responsibility for them. This is the new era of tobacco control - sans industry oversight. And it has truly become a free-for-all for anti-smoking organizations. create by mental act this: the anti-smoking groups can actually affirm that 30 minutes of secondhand smoke exposure is enough to cause hardening of the arteries. They can actually claim that 30 minutes of secondhand smoke exposure increases your assay of a fatal heart contend to the same level as that of an active smoker. They can actually claim that 2 hours of secondhand consume increases your risk of sudden death from a cardiac arrhythmia. And they can get away with it. That's why I evaluate the anti-smoking groups have lost their scientific integrity. Because they can get away with it.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/10/in-my-view-why-has-tobacco-control.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam